阿林斯基12条反叛规则
这是从阿林斯基的完整列表。
规则1:："不仅是你拥有的力量，但敌人以为你有什么。"权力是派生的2–资金和人员主要来源。 "不"必须建立血肉的能力。(这些都是供应充足的两件事。 政府和企业一直很难吸引人，而且通常这样做几乎完全与经济学论据。)
规则2:："永远不要去外面专门知识的人。 "这会导致混乱，恐惧和退缩。感觉安全添加任何人的骨干。 (组织在攻击之下想知道为什么激进分子不处理"真正"的问题。这是为什么。 他们避免他们不知道的事情。 )
规则3:："只要有可能，去外面敌人的专门知识。"寻找方法增加的不安全感、焦虑和不确定。 (这个时间都会发生。 在攻击之下看有多少机构是思想僵化的看似不相关的参数，然后强迫他们解决。)
规则4:："让敌人不辜负其自己的规则书。 "如果规则是，每封信得到回复，发送3万封信。你可以用这个杀了他们因为没有人能够遵守所有的规则。 (这是一个严肃的规则。烽烟四起的实体是非常公信力和信誉处于危险之中，因为如果激进分子抓住它撒谎或不履行其承诺，他们可以继续蚕食破坏。)
规则5:："嘲笑是人的最有力的武器。 "没有防御。 这是非理性的。 这是气愤。它还是点的重要压力，迫使敌人让步。 (很粗，粗鲁和意思，对吧？他们想创造愤怒和恐惧。 )
规则6:："一个好的策略是喜欢你的人之一。 "没有敦促他们会继续做下去，然后回来做更多。他们在做他们的事，甚至会建议更好。 (激进分子，在这个意义上，是其他人没什么不同。我们都避免"联合国的快乐"活动，但是在我们享受和欣赏那些工作，并把结果。 )
规则7:："拖延太久的战术成为拖动。 "别成了旧闻。 (甚至激进分子感到厌倦。所以让他们兴奋和参与，主办单位不断提出新的策略。 )
规则8:："保持压力。放过。 "一直尝试新的东西来保持反对的平衡。 作为反对党的主人一个方法，从侧面撞了他们新的东西。(攻击，攻击，攻击来自四面八方，不会给组织一个休息的机会，重组，恢复和思路。)
规则9:："威胁通常是比事情本身更可怕。 "想象力和自尊心能想出比任何维权更多的后果。(感知就是现实。 大型组织总是准备最坏的，这可能是最远的积极分子的思想。结果是这个组织将花费巨大的时间和精力，创建自己的集体思想极端的结论。可以轻松地毒害思想和结果在道德失范的可能性。 )
规则10:："如果你用力推负面，它将推动并成为积极的。 "从另一边的暴力能赢得市民因为公众同情弱者，你的身边。(工会使用这种策略。 和平[声音]示威期间mid-20th世纪初的全盛时期，工会管理的愤怒，经常以暴力的形式，最终使公众的同情他们一边。)
规则11:："成功的攻击是具有建设性的替代价格。 "不要让敌人得分点不解决问题因为你被抓住。(老话说：如果你不解决方案的一部分，你是问题的一部分。 维权组织有一个议程，他们的策略是把一个位置提供一个论坛来行使权力。所以，他们有一个折衷方案。 )
规则12:：选择目标，定格、个性化和分化。"切断了支持网络隔离目标从同情。在人之后，并没有机构去；人的速度比机构的伤害。(这是残酷的，但非常有效。 直接的、个性化的批评和嘲笑工程。
这是从阿林斯基的完整列表。
规则1:："不仅是你拥有的力量，但敌人以为你有什么。"权力是派生的2–资金和人员主要来源。 "不"必须建立血肉的能力。(这些都是供应充足的两件事。 政府和企业一直很难吸引人，而且通常这样做几乎完全与经济学论据。)
规则2:："永远不要去外面专门知识的人。 "这会导致混乱，恐惧和退缩。感觉安全添加任何人的骨干。 (组织在攻击之下想知道为什么激进分子不处理"真正"的问题。这是为什么。 他们避免他们不知道的事情。 )
规则3:："只要有可能，去外面敌人的专门知识。"寻找方法增加的不安全感、焦虑和不确定。 (这个时间都会发生。 在攻击之下看有多少机构是思想僵化的看似不相关的参数，然后强迫他们解决。)
规则4:："让敌人不辜负其自己的规则书。 "如果规则是，每封信得到回复，发送3万封信。你可以用这个杀了他们因为没有人能够遵守所有的规则。 (这是一个严肃的规则。烽烟四起的实体是非常公信力和信誉处于危险之中，因为如果激进分子抓住它撒谎或不履行其承诺，他们可以继续蚕食破坏。)
规则5:："嘲笑是人的最有力的武器。 "没有防御。 这是非理性的。 这是气愤。它还是点的重要压力，迫使敌人让步。 (很粗，粗鲁和意思，对吧？他们想创造愤怒和恐惧。 )
规则6:："一个好的策略是喜欢你的人之一。 "没有敦促他们会继续做下去，然后回来做更多。他们在做他们的事，甚至会建议更好。 (激进分子，在这个意义上，是其他人没什么不同。我们都避免"联合国的快乐"活动，但是在我们享受和欣赏那些工作，并把结果。 )
规则7:："拖延太久的战术成为拖动。 "别成了旧闻。 (甚至激进分子感到厌倦。所以让他们兴奋和参与，主办单位不断提出新的策略。 )
规则8:："保持压力。放过。 "一直尝试新的东西来保持反对的平衡。 作为反对党的主人一个方法，从侧面撞了他们新的东西。(攻击，攻击，攻击来自四面八方，不会给组织一个休息的机会，重组，恢复和思路。)
规则9:："威胁通常是比事情本身更可怕。 "想象力和自尊心能想出比任何维权更多的后果。(感知就是现实。 大型组织总是准备最坏的，这可能是最远的积极分子的思想。结果是这个组织将花费巨大的时间和精力，创建自己的集体思想极端的结论。可以轻松地毒害思想和结果在道德失范的可能性。 )
规则10:："如果你用力推负面，它将推动并成为积极的。 "从另一边的暴力能赢得市民因为公众同情弱者，你的身边。(工会使用这种策略。 和平[声音]示威期间mid-20th世纪初的全盛时期，工会管理的愤怒，经常以暴力的形式，最终使公众的同情他们一边。)
规则11:："成功的攻击是具有建设性的替代价格。 "不要让敌人得分点不解决问题因为你被抓住。(老话说：如果你不解决方案的一部分，你是问题的一部分。 维权组织有一个议程，他们的策略是把一个位置提供一个论坛来行使权力。所以，他们有一个折衷方案。 )
规则12:：选择目标，定格、个性化和分化。"切断了支持网络隔离目标从同情。在人之后，并没有机构去；人的速度比机构的伤害。(这是残酷的，但非常有效。 直接的、个性化的批评和嘲笑工程。
Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals
Here is the complete list from Alinsky.
* RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
* RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
* RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
* RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
* RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
* RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
* RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
沒有留言:
張貼留言